Legal Opinion

United States v. Milovanovic

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 3, 2010No. 08-30381PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge KLEINFELD; Dissent by Judge FERNANDEZ.

*407OPINION

KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge:

We address “honest services” mail fraud.

I. Facts

The district court dismissed the indictment before trial, so we describe the facts as though the indictment had been proved, which of course is not the case. The question is whether the charges, if proved, would amount to the crime charged.

According to the indictment, defendants Milovanovic and Lamb corrupted issuance of commercial drivers’ licenses in the State of Washington. The other four defendants, Hot, Kovacic, Bilanovic, and Djordjevic, took advantage…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Skilling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Pasquantino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. United States v. BrowneCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. MilovanovicCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. Brano MilovanovicCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. MilovanovicCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. MilovanovicCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API