Legal Opinion

Atherton v. Crandlemire

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 12, 1943PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurchie, J.

In the Trial Court the plaintiff herein recovered a verdict against two defendants as joint tort feasors, wherein damages were assessed at the sum of $800. It is entirely clear under the law in this State that each wrongdoer is liable for the whole amount of damage resulting from separate negligent acts which operate together to cause damage to another, although the party injured can have but one satisfaction, Stuart v. Chapman, 104 Me., 17, 70 A., 1069.

The case comes to this Court on a general motion filed by the defendant Crandlemire alone, and although no exception was noted in connection…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bragdon v. KelloggSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1919
  2. Stuart v. ChapmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1908
  3. Ross v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1927

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Estate of Underwood v. National Credit Union AdministrationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Pure Gas & Chemical Company v. CookWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Meridian City Lines v. BakerMississippi Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Roche v. EganSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  5. Bakken v. LewisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API