Legal Opinion

Hull v. Fuller

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 15, 1835PublishedCited by 12 opinions

This cause came from the court below upon the following bill of exceptions. This was an action on the case for flowing certain lands in Enos-burgh, alleged to be the property of the plaintiff, to wit, part of lot No. 216, by means of a dam of the defendant, erected on his own premises. Plea, not guilty.

Read the full summary

This cause came from the court below upon the following bill of exceptions. This was an action on the case for flowing certain lands in Enos-burgh, alleged to be the property of the plaintiff, to wit, part of lot No. 216, by means of a dam of the defendant, erected on his own premises. Plea, not guilty. On trial, the plaintiff-offered in support of the issue on his part, ]. A deed from Eliphalet Dickinson to himself, dated June 2, 1823, conveying to him lot No. 216 in' Enosburgb, and also a deed from Hare and Lee of the premises to Stephen House, dated Nov. 9, 1809, (which deed was a deed of…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Phelps, J.

The first point, in the natural order of this case, arises out of the proof offered by the plaintiff of his title to the land in question. It is objected, that the deed from Dickinson to him is void for want of a sufficient description. There is an inconsistency in the description of the land conveyed, in this particular : the first boundary given, or the starting point, is on the south or west bank of the stream, on which the defendant’s mills are located. After giving several courses and distances, the line is brought to a point on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Massie v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  2. Shipp v. Miller's HeirsSupreme Court of the United States · 1817

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Neill v. WardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
  2. Clayton v. County CourtWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Lamar v. MinterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1848
  4. Rice v. ChaseSupreme Court of Vermont · 1902
  5. Peter Bay Owners Ass'n, Inc. v. StillmanDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API