Legal Opinion

Lamar v. Minter

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1848PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of Dallas. Before the Hon. Geo. Goldthwaite. This was an action of trespass at the suit of the defendant in error, brought as well to try titles to the east half of the north east quarter of section twenty-seven, in township sixteen of range twelve, situated in the county of Dallas, as to recover damages for its occupancy.

Read the full summary

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of Dallas. Before the Hon. Geo. Goldthwaite. This was an action of trespass at the suit of the defendant in error, brought as well to try titles to the east half of the north east quarter of section twenty-seven, in township sixteen of range twelve, situated in the county of Dallas, as to recover damages for its occupancy. The defendant by way of plea, suggested his adverse possession under the statute— also, that the title of the plaintiff was dormant, that he had made valuable and permanent improvements, &c. He also pleaded a former recovery, and the plea…

1Opinion of the CourtCollier, C. J.

We can conceive of no objection to the admission of the evidence to show that Sheppard S. Johnson, one of the grantees in the patent, was named Sheppard Spencer Johnson, and that he is the same person who executed the deed under which the plaintiff claims, by the name of Spencer S. Johnson. This testimony does not contradict ■either the patent or the deed. It shows nothing more than a transposition of the first and middle name — explains an ambiguity, if indeed it be one, which at most is latent — removes a seeming discrepancy — makes the deed harmonize with the patent, and thus traces to the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Green v. BiddleSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  2. Daniel Boardman and Others, in Error v. The Lessees of Reed and Ford, M'call and Others, in ErrorSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  3. Adams v. FrothinghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
  4. Bott v. BurnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
  5. Rockwell v. AdamsNew York Supreme Court · 1831

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Herbert v. HanrickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
  2. Ross v. IrvingIllinois Supreme Court · 1852
  3. New Orleans & Selma Railroad v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  4. Childs v. ShowerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
  5. Alabama Corn Mills Co. v. Mobile Docks Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API