State v. Nanowski
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LANDAU, J.
The defendant, Jaroslaw Nanowski, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of failure to pay wages in violation of General Statutes § 31-71c (a) and (b).1 On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) General Statutes § 31-71a et seq.2 is unconstitutional as applied to him, (2) if the statute is constitutional on its face, the trial court improperly (a) struck the defendant’s mistake of law defense and (b) failed to instruct the jury that the state was required to prove criminal intent beyond a reasonable doubt, and (3) there was insufficient evidence…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. FreedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Shevlin-Carpenter Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. T.R.D.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. TRDSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. WilsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. NanowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000