Legal Opinion

State v. Dentel

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 1, 2015No. 12C48120; A154401PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHadlock, J.

Defendant was convicted of several crimes, including unlawful use of a weapon with a firearm (UUW-firearm) and felon in possession of a firearm with a firearm (FIP-firearm). He raises two arguments on appeal. First, defendant makes an admittedly unpreserved argument that the trial court plainly erred by not merging the guilty verdicts for UUW-firearm and FIP-firearm into a single conviction. He relies on our opinion in State v. Flores, 259 Or App 141, 313 P3d 378 (2013), rev den, 354 Or 735 (2014), in which we determined that the trial court erred by not merging guilty verdicts for those same…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. CoverstoneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. State v. CorkillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. State v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. State v. BurrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. BreshearsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. KuesterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. State v. NunesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. State v. HernandezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API