Legal Opinion

Briggs & Turivas v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 9, 1936No. E-383PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWhalet, Judge

The plaintiff brings this action for damages for the breach of an express contract entered into on December IT, 1919, between plaintiff and the United States Shipping-Board Emergency Fleet Corporation, acting for and on behalf of the defendant, for the sale by the latter to the former of a large quantity of surplus iron and steel originally acquired for the purpose of building ships.

A summary of the facts is as follows: Throughout the year 1919 a division of the Emergency Fleet Corporation was located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in charge of a Vice President, J. L. Ackerson. After the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Purcell Envelope Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. American Smelting and Refining Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Garfielde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. United States v. Burton Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stebel v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API