Ney Manuf'g Co. v. Superior Drill Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio
In Equity. On motion for preliminary injunction in a suit by tlie JSej Manufacturing Company against the Superior Drill Company and others for the alleged infringement of complainant’s patent.
1Opinion of the Court
SAGE, District Judge.
The complainant filed its hill for infringement on the 27th of March, 1893. Respondents were served *153AvitJi process on the 32th. of April, and on the 12th of May with notice that on the next day (Saturday, the 13th) an application for an injunction would he made, and that upon the hearing the complainant would file and use affidavits of seven persons named in the notice, copies of which affidavits were served with the notice. On the 13ih the application was presented to the court. Counsel for respondents was present with such affidavits and exhibits as he could muster in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Parker v. SearsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1850
3Cited by6 opinions
- Uniroyal, Inc. v. Daly-Herring Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1968
- Kohler v. George Worthington Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1896
- Powell v. Leicester Mills Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1900
- Taber Bas-Relief Photograph Co. v. MarceauU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1898
- Æolian Co. v. Cunningham Piano Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.