Legal Opinion
Douvas v. Newcomb
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 12, 1954No. 35644PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CORN, Justice.
The disposition to be made of this appeal does not require an extended statement of the issues presented by the pleadings, or of the factual situation reflected by the evidence adduced at the trial.
Defendants owned a brick'building in the city of Sapulpa, Oklahoma. The principal portion of this building was leased to an Oklahoma corporation, which does not appear as an appealing defendant herein, for operation of what was known locally as the Loraine Hotel. The building also housed a private club, which leased its portion of the premises from defendants, and a restaurant or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Franklin v. Skelly Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- Hadley v. RossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Hays v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1922
- Arnold v. Board of County Com'rsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Banks v. Southern Potteries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Blankenship v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Harris v. ConwaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- In Re Estate of LaSargeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Scaggs v. Lindsey Well Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- City of Enid v. ReeserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.