Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Prudential Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 28, 1984No. 427PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

This action stems from a disputed insurance claim. The instant appeal follow* an order by the lower court appointing a neutral arbitrator and directing that arbitration take place in Philadelphia County. Appellant, Prudential Insurance Company, challenges the venue aspect of that order. Appellee has responded on the merits, but asserts that the trial court’s order is interlocutory and nonappealable under Pa.R.A.P., Rule 311(a), 42 Pa.C.S.A.

We address initially the question of jurisdiction. 1

Under 42 Pa.C.S. Sec. 7320(a)(1), a party may appeal an order denying a petition to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brennan v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Maleski v. Mutual Fire, Marine & Inland InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Patton v. Hanover InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Clark v. State Farm Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Marino v. General Accident InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. DiLucente Corp. v. Pennsylvania Roofing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API