Legal Opinion

Piersall v. Sportsvision of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 26, 1992No. 1-90-1963PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

Plaintiff, James Piersall (Piersall), appeals from an order of the circuit court of Cook County granting summary judgment in favor of defendants Jerry Reinsdorf (Reinsdorf) and Edward Einhorn (Einhorn) as to counts I, II, and IV of his amended complaint. Counts I and II alleged that Reinsdorf and Einhorn tortiously interfered with Piersall’s business relationship and contract with WMAQ radio, and count IV alleged that Reinsdorf libeled Piersall by calling him a liar. On appeal, plaintiff contends that: (1) he sufficiently alleged a cause of action against Reinsdorf for defamation in count IV…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Hopewell v. VitulloAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  2. Doherty v. KahnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  3. Madison v. FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  4. Kumaran v. BrotmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  5. Quinn v. Jewel Food Stores, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API