Sutton v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
LATTIMORE, Judge. —
Appellant urges error on our part in reforming his sentence, — which had been by the trial court erroneously entered at two years, — so as to make same state the penalty as one year. We reformed the sentence to correspond with the verdict. Appellant urges error on our part in so doing. In felony cases tried by juries alone, under the procedure in this State, the power to fix the punishment is exclusively in the hands of the jury. If the sentence pronounced does not correspond with the punishment so fixed by the jury, this court on appeal has power to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Holden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Hart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Laudermilk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
- Smiddy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.