Legal Opinion

Smiddy v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 17, 1925No. 9124PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is unlawfully passing a forged instrument; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of four years.

No necessity is perceived for stating or discussing the evidence. Suffice it to say that it is quite sufficient to establish the facts upon which the State relied for a conviction and upon which the verdict is based.

No exceptions appear to have been taken to the introduction or exclusion of evidence or to the rulings of the court save that denying the motion for new trial.

The indictment is regular and contains two counts, both of which…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pearson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Boyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. Sutton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API