Legal Opinion

Curtis v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 2, 2009No. Criminal Action No. 03-533. Civil Action No. 08-805PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GLADYS KESSLER, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Petitioner’s Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence [Dkt. No. 121]. Petitioner Carlos Curtis, a prisoner proceeding pro se in this matter, 1 petitions this Court to set aside or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 2255. 2 Upon consideration of the Motion, Opposition, and the entire record herein, for the reasons discussed below, Petitioner’s motion is denied.

I. BACKGROUND

On March 31, 2004, a nine-count superseding indictment was filed in the United States District…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. MooreDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API