Legal Opinion

Schuster v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 5, 1993No. 2-92-124-CRPublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAY, Justice.

Ivan Joseph Schuster appeals his conviction of indecency with a child. Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 21.11 (Vernon 1989). The jury assessed punishment at fifteen years confinement and a $3,500 fine.

We affirm.

In his sole point of error, Schuster complains the trial court improperly determined Mary Hutton, a psychologist, was the outcry witness in this case.

The State called three witnesses to prove its case at the guilt/innocence phase of trial: Hutton; the complainant (A.K.); and A.K.’s mother, Joy Treadway. Hutton, a psychologist, was called first.

Outside the jury’s presence,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Dorado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Dorado v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1992

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Bargas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  2. Shaw v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
  3. Josey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
  4. Sims v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2000
  5. Nino v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API