Schuster v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAY, Justice.
Ivan Joseph Schuster appeals his conviction of indecency with a child. Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 21.11 (Vernon 1989). The jury assessed punishment at fifteen years confinement and a $3,500 fine.
We affirm.
In his sole point of error, Schuster complains the trial court improperly determined Mary Hutton, a psychologist, was the outcry witness in this case.
The State called three witnesses to prove its case at the guilt/innocence phase of trial: Hutton; the complainant (A.K.); and A.K.’s mother, Joy Treadway. Hutton, a psychologist, was called first.
Outside the jury’s presence,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Dorado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Dorado v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1992
3Cited by43 opinions
- Bargas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
- Shaw v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
- Josey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
- Sims v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2000
- Nino v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.