Brooks v. Friedman
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RATLIFF, Senior Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Defendant-Appellant Charles . Brooks ("Brooks") appeals from a jury verdict against him and in favor of Plaintiff Appel-lee Gregory Friedman ("Friedman") in a personal injury action.
We reverse and remand.
ISSUES
We find one issue to be dispositive of this appeal; however, we address Brooks' additional issues because of the likelihood that they will arise again in the event of a retrial of the action.
I. Whether the trial court committed reversible error by refusing to instruct the jury on the doctrine of sudden emer-geney.
II. Whether the trial…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barnard v. HimesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Faulkner v. Markkay of Indiana, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Compton v. PletchIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Schaefer v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
3Cited by16 opinions
- Willis v. WesterfieldIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Walker v. CuppettIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- In Re the Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship of E.T.Indiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Wanda Denson v. The Estate of Delmer Dillard and Indiana Farmers Mutual Insurance CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- Regenstreif v. PhelpsKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.