Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Friedman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 2002No. 49A02-0105-CV-333PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RATLIFF, Senior Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Defendant-Appellant Charles . Brooks ("Brooks") appeals from a jury verdict against him and in favor of Plaintiff Appel-lee Gregory Friedman ("Friedman") in a personal injury action.

We reverse and remand.

ISSUES

We find one issue to be dispositive of this appeal; however, we address Brooks' additional issues because of the likelihood that they will arise again in the event of a retrial of the action.

I. Whether the trial court committed reversible error by refusing to instruct the jury on the doctrine of sudden emer-geney.

II. Whether the trial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barnard v. HimesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Faulkner v. Markkay of Indiana, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Compton v. PletchIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Schaefer v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Willis v. WesterfieldIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Walker v. CuppettIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. In Re the Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship of E.T.Indiana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Wanda Denson v. The Estate of Delmer Dillard and Indiana Farmers Mutual Insurance CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Regenstreif v. PhelpsKentucky Supreme Court · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API