Legal Opinion · Dissent

Estate of Michelle Evette McCall v. United States

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 13, 2014No. SC11-1148Published

1DissentPolston, C.J.

I respectfully dissent because the plurality disregards the rational basis standard prescribed by our precedent as well as the Legislature’s policy role under Florida’s constitution. The Legislature’s policy choice of enacting a cap of $1 million on noneconomic damages in medical malpractice cases involving death is rationally related to the legitimate state interest of decreasing medical malpractice insurance rates and increasing the affordability and availability of health care in Florida. Therefore, under our precedent, the cap does not violate Florida’s constitutional guarantee of equal…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Smith v. Department of Ins.Supreme Court of Florida · 1987
  5. Kluger v. WhiteSupreme Court of Florida · 1973

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API