In Re United States of America
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CHARLES CLARK, Circuit Judge:
Defendants were indicted for conspiracy to violate various federal statutes. During the course of the trial, one of the defendants invoked Federal Rule of Evidence 615 which requires the exclusion of witnesses from the courtroom.1 The second exception *667to Rule 615 provides that a witness may remain in the courtroom if he is “an officer or employee of a party which is not a natural person designated as its representative by its attorney.” The government designated a federal agent, Doredant, who had been involved in the preparation of the ease, as its representative…
2Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. Carlos Manuel Parodi, United States of America v. Edwin Barton Conway, United States of America v. Robert Lee LawsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. John Henry Butera, Robert Andrew DenomaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- United States v. MachorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Javier Robles-PantojaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Arthur AnagnosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.