Legal Opinion

State v. Schlanger

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 6, 1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLIN, J.S.C.

This opinion supplements a letter opinion and addresses the “no civil use” provision of R. 3:9-2. It examines the considerations to be weighed in permitting a prior guilty plea to be used in pending civil litigation where the monetary aspect of the damages sought is of significant financial consequence. Cognate to this inquiry is the relationship between the concern of a defendant that such plea not be evidential in any subsequent civil proceeding and the desirability to conserve both judicial and prosecutorial resources through disposition of a criminal indictment by plea. The…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Emich Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Brohawn v. Transamerica InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. United States v. Leonard L. Cappetto, Individually and Doing Business as Western AvenuebilliardsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mann v. Estate of MeyersDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
  2. State v. La RussoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
  3. SAYER TECHNOLOGIES, S.L. v. VISCOFAN COLLAGEN USA INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API