Legal Opinion

Michael S. Brown, Joseph L. Goldstein, and Yuval Reiss v. Mariano Barbacid and Veeraswamy Manne

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided January 11, 2002No. 586Published

1Opinion of the Court

276 F.3d 1327 (Fed. Cir. 2002)

MICHAEL S. BROWN, JOSEPH L. GOLDSTEIN, and YUVAL REISS, Appellants,

v.

MARIANO BARBACID and VEERASWAMY MANNE, Appellees.

00-1590

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Interference no. 103,586)

DECIDED: January 11, 2002

Appealed from: United States Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences[Copyrighted Material Omitted][Copyrighted Material Omitted]

David L. Parker, Fulbright & Jaworski, L.L.P., of Austin, Texas, argued for appellants. With him on the brief was Steven L. Highlander. Of counsel was Marcy Hogan Greer.

Steven W.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. In Re Robert J. Gartside and Richard C. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  3. Hybritech Incorporated v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  4. Richard C. Price v. Dale R. SymsekCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  5. Del Vecchio v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API