Legal Opinion
Real Estate Mort. Co. of Louisville v. Duke
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided November 21, 1933PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Chief Justice Rees
Affirming.
On May 27, 1922, Owen Duke, a negro, entered into an agreement with. McAlister & Co., representing W. H. McAlister, to purchase lot No. 194 in the Woodlawn addition in Louisville, Ky., for the sum of $275. Ho paid $1 down and agreed to pay the balance in install ments of $1 payable weekly. The contract contained the following provisions:
“(1) It is agreed that the purchaser shall keep all special assessments and taxes against said lot paid as the same become payable if any be assessed. (2) It is agreed that when the said purchase price and all…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Herzog v. GipsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- Buford v. Louisville & Nashville R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1884
- Allison v. Cocke'sCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mid-Continent Life Ins. Co. v. GoforthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Sebastian v. FloydKentucky Supreme Court · 1979
- Mattingly Bridge Co. v. Holloway & Son Construction Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1985
- Coca-Cola Bottling Works (Thomas) Inc. v. Hazard Coca-Cola Bottling Works, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
- In Re YostUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.