Legal Opinion

Overman v. . Lanier

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 9, 1911PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Lyon, J., at May Termj 1911, of RowaN. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court by Mr. Chief Justice Clark.

1Opinion of the Court

Clabe:, C. J.

This case was referred by consent, and on the coming in of the report there were many exceptions, both to the findings of facts and to the conclusions of law. The record states that all exceptions were overruled and that the court confirmed the report in all respects. Both sides appealed. When the case was called in this Court it was stated by counsel on both sides that the judge below, owing, to the rush of business and the anxiety of both parties to get the case sent up for review, had entered a pro forma judgment without having really considered any.of the exceptions.

Under the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Union Bank of Richmond v. Commissioners of OxfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  2. Miller v. . GroomeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  3. Turlington v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fisher v. . Toxaway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. MacOn v. MurraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API