Zachery v. Royal Indemnity Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) At the time of the initial hearing before the Board of Workmen’s Compensation, more than a year had elapsed since the death of the employee. No claim had been filed for death benefits other than that of the decedent’s mother, and all other claims were then barred by the statute of limitations. It is apparent that, had the wife filed her claim within the statutory period, she would' have been entitled to the death benefits allowable under the act; and had there been no wife, the mother would have been entitled to such benefits. The precise question is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. SumrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Smith v. HatcherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Marshall v. Macon Sash, Door & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Allen v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
- Porter v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Insurance Co. of North America v. JewelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Bonnin v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- Employers Mutual Liability Ins. Co. of Wis. v. JardeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. MiniweatherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- H. L. Maness Truck Lines v. LemmonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.