Legal Opinion

Agency for Int'l Dev. v. Alliance for Open Soc'y Int'l, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 29, 2020No. 19-177Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Thomas

*2090I agree with the Court that the Policy Requirement does not violate the First Amendment as applied to respondents' foreign affiliates, and I agree that nothing about this Court's decision in Agency for Int'l Development v. Alliance for Open Society Int'l, Inc. , 570 U.S. 205, 133 S.Ct. 2321, 186 L.Ed.2d 398 (2013) ( AOSI I ), suggests otherwise. See ante , at 2089. I write separately to note my continued disagreement with AOSI I and to explain that the Policy Requirement does not violate the First Amendment for a far simpler reason: It does not compel anyone to say anything.

In AOSI I , the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican PartySupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Rust v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Wooley v. MaynardSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. United States v. RainesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API