State v. Poole
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtNadeau, J.
The defendant, Nathan T. Poole, appeals his conviction, following a jury trial in Superior Court (Smukler, J.), for simple assault, see RSA 631:2-a (1996). He argues that the trial court’s response to a jury question constructively amended the complaint to his prejudice. We reverse and remand.
The following facts were recited by the trial court in its order on the defendant’s motion to vacate, or appear in the record. The defendant was charged by complaint with, among other things, simple assault on his wife. The complaint alleged that on December 22, 2001, at 7:00 p.m., the defendant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. LambertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- State v. SeymourSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
- State v. FrenchSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- State v. DingmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
- State v. HammellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. LittlefieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- State v. O'LearySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- State v. DrakeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- State v. McCoyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.