Southern Exchange Bank v. First National Bank
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
It is well settled by numerous and repeated decisions of all courts that a national bank can not bind itself by a contract of guaranty made solely for the benefit of another. However, it is equally well settled that a contract of guaranty made by such a bank for its own benefit is valid and binding and is not ultra vires. The power to malee such a contract is one of the implied or incidental powers arising from the express or specific powers granted to national hanks by the provisions of section 5136- of the Revised Statutes of the United States. Under that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cochran & Sayre v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- National Bank v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- People's Bank v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Towers Excelsior & Ginnery Co. v. InmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Savannah Ice Co. v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- O'Connor v. Bankers Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1936
- First Nat'l Bank v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1937
- Town & Country Bank v. E. & D. Bancshares, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- McCoy v. AdamsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
- Commonwealth v. Philadelphia Saving Fund SocietySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.