Legal Opinion

Southern Exchange Bank v. First National Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 10, 1928No. 17995PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

It is well settled by numerous and repeated decisions of all courts that a national bank can not bind itself by a contract of guaranty made solely for the benefit of another. However, it is equally well settled that a contract of guaranty made by such a bank for its own benefit is valid and binding and is not ultra vires. The power to malee such a contract is one of the implied or incidental powers arising from the express or specific powers granted to national hanks by the provisions of section 5136- of the Revised Statutes of the United States. Under that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cochran & Sayre v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. National Bank v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. People's Bank v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Towers Excelsior & Ginnery Co. v. InmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  5. Savannah Ice Co. v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. O'Connor v. Bankers Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1936
  2. First Nat'l Bank v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1937
  3. Town & Country Bank v. E. & D. Bancshares, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  4. McCoy v. AdamsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Commonwealth v. Philadelphia Saving Fund SocietySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API