People v. Norris
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFiles, P. J.
Appellants Norris and Parham, and their codefendant Alvarez (who is not appealing), were charged in count I with statutory rape, in violation of Penal Code section 261, subdivision 1, in that they did have sexual intercourse with a girl named Betty, aged 16. In count II Alvarez was charged with oral copulation with a girl named Doranne, in violation of Penal Code section 288a. The jury found all three defendants not guilty of the felonies charged, but guilty of contributing to the delinquency of a minor in violation of Penal Code section 272, 1 an offense the commission of which is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. GreerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- In Re HessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- People v. WilhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- People v. ChesterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mandel v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- People v. RomeroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Mandel v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969