Legal Opinion

People v. Norris

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 13, 1967No. Crim. 12334PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFiles, P. J.

Appellants Norris and Parham, and their codefendant Alvarez (who is not appealing), were charged in count I with statutory rape, in violation of Penal Code section 261, subdivision 1, in that they did have sexual intercourse with a girl named Betty, aged 16. In count II Alvarez was charged with oral copulation with a girl named Doranne, in violation of Penal Code section 288a. The jury found all three defendants not guilty of the felonies charged, but guilty of contributing to the delinquency of a minor in violation of Penal Code section 272, 1 an offense the commission of which is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. GreerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. In Re HessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. People v. WilhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. People v. ChesterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mandel v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. People v. RomeroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Mandel v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API