Legal Opinion

Mandel v. Municipal Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 8, 1969No. Civ. 26042Published

1Opinion of the Court

276 Cal.App.2d 649 (1969)

81 Cal. Rptr. 173

ROBERT MANDEL, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

THE MUNICIPAL COURT FOR THE OAKLAND-PIEDMONT JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, Defendant and Respondent; THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Docket No. 26042.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

October 8, 1969.

Garry, Dreyfus, McTernan & Brotsky, Donald L.A. Kerson, David E. Pesonen and Charles C. Marson for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Paul N. Halvonik as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.

No appearance for Defendant and Respondent.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney…

2Cases cited99 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API