Legal Opinion
Harrison v. Hughes
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 1, 1903No. 38PublishedCited by 17 opinions
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District ■of Delaware.
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, Circuit Judge.
A careful review of the testimony, as disclosed in the record in this case, convinces us that the decree of the court below should be affirmed. The opinion of the learned judge of that court so entirely, and satisfactorily to us, covers all the points in controversy, that we adopt the same as the opinion of this court. It is as follows:
“The libel in this case is in personam and was filed by Albert Harrison, ■master of the British steamship Glenochil, against Eugene Hughes, James Hughes, Charles Hughes and Ansom Bangs, trading as Hughes Bros. & Bangs, to recover damages for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- The ChinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- The John G. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Atlee v. Packet Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Casement v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- The MajesticSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- The People Of The State Of California v. The Italian Motorship IliceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1911
- Converse v. Portsmouth Cotton Oil Refining Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1922
- Consolidated Coal Co. v. Knickerbocker Steam Towage Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1912
- The ManhattanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1932
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.