Legal Opinion

State v. Bernard

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 23, 2018No. 14–15–00822–CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartha Hill Jamison, Justice

This State's appeal arises from the trial court's suppression of evidence obtained during a warrantless stop and blood alcohol test results in the prosecution of appellee Albert Tyrone Bernard for misdemeanor driving while intoxicated. It comes to us on remand from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See State v. Bernard , 512 S.W.3d 351 (Tex. Crim. App. 2017).

We originally held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in suppressing the warrantless stop and results of a blood draw because the State presented no evidence that Bernard's failure to stay in a single marked lane was…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Wiede v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  4. Kothe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  5. Valtierra v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Berrick Milton Blackwell v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2025
  2. Leticia Perez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2019
  3. State v. Brandon David Prince, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2019
  4. State v. Pablo Daniel Calzada-Rodriguez, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API