Legal Opinion
A Classic Time v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided October 16, 1989No. Court Nos. 87-08-00862Published
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Restani, Judge:
These actions were dismissed by the Clerk of the Court on various dates, from September 8, 1988 to March 9, 1989 pursuant to Rule 83(c) of this court1. This matter is before the court on plaintiffs’ motions pursuant to Rule 60(b)(1) for orders granting relief from the orders of dismissal, because of mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect.
I. Dismissal of plaintiffs’ actions was due to mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect.
Plaintiffs base these motions upon the existence of mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Marvin Kagan v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Salvatore Cirami, Salvatore Cirami & Margaret CiramiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Mayfair Extension, Inc. v. Warren E. MageeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Coclin Tobacco Co., Inc. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.