Legal Opinion

Harrington v. Freedom of Information Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided September 6, 2016No. SC19586PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDONALD, J.

**3 Clients call upon attorneys to provide advice on a range of matters, some that may be purely legal, some that may be purely nonlegal, and others where the line between legal and nonlegal advice is more nuanced. This case provides an opportunity to address the circumstances under which communications relating to both nonlegal and legal advice may be covered by the attorney-client privilege.

The plaintiff, Michael C. Harrington, appeals from the trial court's judgment dismissing his appeal from the decision of the Freedom of Information Commission, 1 which concluded that e-mails that the *409…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
  3. United States v. Martin SchwimmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  4. Debra A. And George Simon v. G.D. Searle & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  5. Hercules Inc. v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
  2. Luck v. McMahonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
  3. Pace-O-Matic, Inc. v. Eckert, Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  4. Pace-O-Matic, Inc. v. Eckert, Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  5. Parimal v. Manitex International, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API