National Union Fire Insurance v. American Motorists Insurance
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Fletcher, Presiding Justice.
We granted certiorari in this case to consider whether an excess insurer is required to reserve its rights against a primary insurer before asserting later that additional primary insurance covers the claim. Because the excess insurer in this case was not seeking to deny coverage under its policy and had no contractual obligation to the primary insurer, we hold that there is no requirement that the excess insurer notify the primary insurer that it was “reserving its rights.” Therefore, we reverse the court of appeals.
National Union Fire Insurance Company issued an…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Robert & Company Associates v. Rhodes-Haverty PartnershipSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Beauchamp v. KnightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Maryland Casualty Insurance v. WelchelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
- Home Insurance Co. v. North River InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hoover v. Maxum Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2012
- Southwest Steel Coil, Inc. v. Redwood Fire & Casualty InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
- Continental Insurance v. American Motorist InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Capitol Indemnity Corp. v. FraleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Langdale Co. v. National Union Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.