Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Kansas City Life Insurance v. Bland

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 2, 1945No. 39164PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, C. J.

This is an original proceeding in cer-tiorari to review for conflict with the latest controlling decisions of this court respondents’ opinion in Spillman v. Kansas City Life Insurance Company (Mo. App.), 180 S. W. (2d) 605.

Nora Spillman, the beneficiary of two identical life insurance policies, sued the insurance company under the double indemnity provisions for the additional indemnity claiming assured died from an accident. Assured shot and killed himself while insane. The policies attempt to exclude from the double indemnity benefit, death resulting from self-destruction while insane but…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wendorff v. Missouri State Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  2. Brunswick v. Standard Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
  3. State Ex Rel. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. ShainSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  4. Spillman v. Kansas City Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1944

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sommer v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  2. Ieppert v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. Kaskowitz v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. Mallin v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Mallin v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API