Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Doll

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided February 4, 1895PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from First district court. Action by James D. Johnson against Julius Doll for rent. There was a judgment in favor of defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBookstaver, J.

The issues in this action were joined by written complaint and answer. The plaintiff sued for rent of store and first floor of Ho. 1305 Lexington avenue, in this city, for the months of February, March, and April, 1894, amounting to the sum of $114.99, under a yearly letting by one Anton Schwarz, plaintiff’s assignor, to the defendant. The answer admitted nonpayment of the rent, and alleged that the plaintiff was not the real party in interest, and that one Emanuel Popper was, and that said Popper was defendant’s landlord, and owner of the premises, and set up as a defense the surrender of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Schuyler v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Laughran v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Thomas v. . NelsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. Coudert v. . CohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Ackley v. . WesterveltNew York Court of Appeals · 1881

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lewis v. New York City Railway Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1906
  2. Douglass v. SeiferdAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1896
  3. Gebby v. CarrilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Feust v. CraigAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1907
  5. Bolster v. New York City RailwayNew York Supreme Court · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API