Legal Opinion
Feust v. Craig
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided December 12, 1907PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of the Bronx, Second District. Action for rent by Sigmund Feust against Horatio Craig. From a. judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed, and new trial granted.
1Opinion of the CourtGiederseeeve, P. J.
The action is to recover the sum of $135,, being the rent of a store in a tenement house owned by plaintiff for the months of May, June, and July, 1907, at the monthly rent of $45. Defendant, upon hiring the premises and paying the first month’s rent, received the following receipt, which was made in duplicate and signed by both parties, viz.:
“Received of Mr. Horatio Craig $45 for rent * * * from the 15th day of December, 1906, to the 15th day of January, 1907. It is also agreed that within one week from date a written lease will be given by the landlord an® taken by the tenant from the 15th…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sanders v. Pottlitzer Bros. Fruit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Gray v. Kaufman Dairy & Ice Cream Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Underhill v. . CollinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- In Re the General Assignment of HevenorNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Gray v. Kaufman Dairy & Ice Cream Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Abbadessa v. TeguSupreme Court of Vermont · 1958
- Feust v. CraigAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1908
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of the Administrators of GruganNew York Surrogate's Court · 1927