State ex rel. Rosenblatt v. New Lindell Hotel Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court, Wickham, J.
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
According to an agreed statement of facts on file; the record shows that the respondent, plaintiff below, brought suit under the statutes in such case made and provided, upon the tax-bill mentioned in the petition, for the unpaid *451taxes of the year 1876 on the property of the defendant (appellant), the New Lindell Hotel Company, therein described.
To this petition the defendant filed an answer, which is in words and figures as follows: “Defendant, the New Lindell Hotel Company, for answer to plaintiff’s petition, says that on the first day of August, 1874, there was begun, as provided by law,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Taylor v. SecorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Loan Assn. v. TopekaSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Porter v. Rockford, Rock Island & St. Louis RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Sioux City & Pacific Railroad v. Washington CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1873
- Pacific Railroad v. Cass CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Thomas v. GaySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Enron Corp. v. Spring Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Carroll v. AlsupTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
- State v. AddingtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1882
- Ohlwine v. BushnellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.