Rubenstein v. Weil
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NOBLE, Justice.
Louis Rubenstein and Howard M. Rosenthal, plaintiffs, below, have appealed from a judgment dismissing their complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
The facts upon which the case rests where the complaint is attacked as failing to state a cause of • action are the facts alleged in the complaint. Jones v. International Union of Operating Engineers, 72 N.M. 322, 383 P.2d 571.
The facts here may be summarized from the allegations of the complaint and its attached exhibits, thus: The plaintiffs entered into a written contract with Robert H. Weil and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jones v. International Union of Operating EngineersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Jernigan v. New Amsterdam Casualty CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Hughes v. Samedan Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
- Fullerton v. KauneNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Fuller v. CrockerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Spingola v. SpingolaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
- Owen v. Burn Construction Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- Balizer Ex Rel. Bazan v. ShaverNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
- DeBaca, Inc. v. MontoyaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
- McDonald v. JourneyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.