Legal Opinion

Newton v. Cox

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 7, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARMER, Judge.

Plaintiff William P. Newton appeals the trial court’s order awarding him a $28,125 judgment against his former attorney, Defendant/Appellee James S. Cox, but denying Newton’s claim for prejudgment interest. Newton’s claim arose out of Cox’s retention of a contingency fee in excess of the maximum permitted by statute. We affirm the judgment entered in favor of Newton, but with certain modifications hereinafter set forth.

Cox previously represented Newton and Newton’s former wife in a medical malpractice action. In the complaint filed by Cox, Newton sought $3 million in damages for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Vance v. SchulderTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Jaffe v. BoltonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
  3. Mitchell v. MitchellTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Newton v. CoxTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Gotten v. GottenCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. Tires Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2001
  2. Donna Martin v. Mary ColemanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  3. Judd's v. MuirCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API