Legal Opinion
Riggins v. City of Kansas City
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided August 23, 2011No. WD 72764PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judge.
This case involves a dispute over the validity of a City of Kansas City, Missouri (“City”) ordinance approving an amendment to a Chapter 353 contract between the City and Loretto Redevelopment Corporation (“Loretto”). Cynthia S. Riggins and Thomas K. Riggins (collectively “Rig-gins”) appeal from the trial court’s judgment declaring that the City did not act arbitrarily, unreasonably, or unlawfully in adopting the ordinance. We affirm.
Factual and Procedural History
In 1996, Loretto filed an application proposing a Chapter 353 1 redevelopment plan to rehabilitate…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Flora Realty & Investment Co. v. City of LadueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Neill v. GatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- Howard v. YoungmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Binger v. City of IndependenceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Matt Miller Co. v. Taylor-Martin Holdings, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- Great Rivers Habitat Alliance v. City of St. PetersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- Custom Hardware Engineering & Consulting, Inc. v. DowellDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2013
- City of Carthage, Missouri v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2022
- Green Street 2900 Investors, LLC v. The St. Louis Woodworks, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2022