Legal Opinion
Kindle Building Co. v. Ford Motor Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided July 2, 1997No. 3:96CV7332PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Order
CARR, District Judge.
This is an action for indemnification in which plaintiff Kindle Building Co. (Kindle) claims that defendant Ford Motor Company (Ford) should indemnify plaintiff for the breach by Maumee Ford (a Ford subsidiary) of a lease between Kindle and Maumee Ford. Pending are defendant’s renewed motion to dismiss or for summary judgment (Doc. 20) and plaintiffs motion for leave to file an amended complaint. (Doe. 23). For the following reasons, the motion to dismiss shall be granted, and plaintiffs motion to amend its complaint shall be denied.
Background
Mr. Harry S. Kindle, the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Franchise Realty Interstate Corporation and McDonald Systems of California, Inc. v. San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Bucyrus-Erie Company, Cross-Appellant v. General Products Corporation and John A. Hubly, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Dennis and Rose Verhein v. South Bend Lathe, Inc. And Travelers Indemnity Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Monacelli v. GrimesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1953
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- AP Alternatives, LLC v. Rosendin Electric, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2019