Legal Opinion
People v. Englehardt
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 26, 1938No. Crim. 438PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
The respondent has moved to dismiss this appeal upon the ground that written notice of appeal was not filed with the clerk of the court within two days after the rendition of the judgment, as required by section 1239 of the Penal Code.
It appears from the certificate of the clerk of the trial court that the defendant was, on June 7, 1938, found guilty of the crime of bigamy by the verdict of a jury; that no motion for a new trial was made; that time for the pronouncing of judgment was set for June 11, 1938; that an application for probation was made and the hearing thereon set for July 7,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Lancel v. PostlethwaiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Payne v. HuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- People v. MaloneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Starr v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. SlobodionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Deleon v. Bay Area Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Purifoy v. HowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Usher v. SoltzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- People v. BoothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.