Legal Opinion

Springer v. Schultz

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 30, 1903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Trespass on the Case, for personal injuries. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. George W. Patton, Judge presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

In this case the jury .found the issues for the plaintiff below and assessed his damages in the sum of $25,000, and for this amount judgment was entered. Appellant, Mr. Springer, insists that he was not guilty of the negligence charged, and if guilty, still the verdict was grossly excessive, and at all events, because of newly discovered evidence, he should have been given a new trial.

First: Upon the question of negligence, the entire record of this case must be considered, not to determine upon which side the evidence preponderates, but to learn whether there is evidence substantial and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. BlumenthalIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Springer v. FordIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Hartford Deposit Co. v. SollittIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Knickerbocker Insurance v. GouldIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Sawyer v. J. M. Arnold Shoe Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1897

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Monaghan v. Equitable Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  2. Smith v. ShookMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Winheim v. FieldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903
  4. Hansell-Elcock Foundry Co. v. ClarkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904
  5. Shaughnessy v. HoltAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API