Hoban v. Hudson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Swift county to recover $2,500. The case was tried before Qvale, J., who made findings and ordered judgment dismissing the action. From an order denying plaintiff’s motion to amend the findings of fact or for a new trial, he appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
June 7, 1910, plaintiff bought from Minnesota-Arizona Copper Co. 4166 shares of its capital stock for $2,500. In the deal he obtained from the company a contract by which he could exchange these shares for certain other shares in another corporation, but if he did not choose to exercise this privilege, on or before April 1, 1912, he could avail himself of this provision: “It is hereby further agreed that the undersigned will refund to the said Iloban the said sum of twenty-five hundred ($2500.00) dollars on June 8, 1912, on thejcgs. turn of said stock of the Minnesota-Arizona Copper Co.,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Howard v. . DalyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Alworth v. GordonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Steele v. BondSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Manufacturers & Merchants' Mutual Ins. v. ZeitingerIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- Bohn Manufacturing Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cities Service Oil Co. v. National Shawmut BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Central Metropolitan Bank v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Salminen v. FranksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- George J. Becker and Isabelle Becker v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Kehrer v. SeemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.