Tingley v. Otis
California Supreme Court
MOTION to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County granting a change of the place of trial. N. H. Conklin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
VAN DYKE, J.—
This is an appeal hy plaintiff from an order granting the defendants’ motion for a change of the place of trial from the county of San Diego to the county of Los Angeles.
Defendants moved to dismiss said appeal on the ground that the appellant had not served or filed printed points and authorities within thirty days after the filing of the transcript, as required by the rules of this court. That motion was argued and 'submitted July 6, 1903. Thereafter, October 19, 1903, at the Los Angeles term of court, respondents, pursuant to notice given, moved to strike from the printed…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Hughes v. DemundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Johnson v. SolomonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Cobb v. Estate of CobbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942