Legal Opinion

Eutectic Corp. v. Metco, Inc.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided October 29, 1973No. 72 C 102PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

NEAHER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs in this action for declaratory judgment challenging the validity of defendant’s patents have moved for an order under F.R.Civ.P. 37(a) compelling the defendant to produce certain documents. The facts, as gleaned from the accompanying papers, do not appear to be in dispute. Plaintiffs and defendant agreed to a protective order in which defendant permitted plaintiffs to inspect the documents in its patent files and set aside those to be “duplicated for purposes of production.” Plaintiffs did inspect defendant’s documents, setting aside those…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
  3. Radiant Burners, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. American Gas Association, Peoples Gas Light and Coke CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
  4. D. I. Chadbourne, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Giulio Natta, Piero Pino and Georgio Mazzanti, Ex Rel. Interference 89,634 v. Alex Zletz and Standard Oil Company of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
  2. Hercules Inc. v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
  3. Burlington Industries v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1974
  4. SCM Corp. v. Xerox Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1976
  5. United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API