Gervasoni v. City of Petaluma
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDS, J., pro tem.
This action is one to quiet title to certain property in the city of Petaluma, to which the plaintiffs claim ownership in fee simple, but which title the defendant city of Petaluma denies, and further sets up an easement and right of way for passage through, over and across the said property as a public street. The trial court found in the main in the plaintiffs’ favor, adjudging them to be the owners of the frontage claimed by them upon Main Street in said city, but reserving to the city certain easements in the rear portion of the property covering what is known as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ashby v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Jones v. City of PetalumaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Parchen v. AshbyMontana Supreme Court · 1883
- Scully v. SquierIdaho Supreme Court · 1907
3Cited by2 opinions
- Raney v. MerrittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Dabney v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1928