Legal Opinion

Omni Corp. v. Sonitrol Corp.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided March 2, 2007No. 3:06-cr-00265PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING AND ORDER

CHATIGNY, District Judge.

This is a diversity action against a provider of alarm services to recover damages arising from flooding at commercial premises. Defendant has moved to dismiss the action insofar as it seeks damages in excess of $300, the amount provided for in a damages limitation clause in the parties’ contract. In addition, defendant moves to dismiss a claim brought under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUT-PA), Conn. Gen.Stat. §§ 42-110a, et seq. For the reasons' that follow, the motion is granted.

I. Facts

The complaint alleges the following facts, which…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  2. Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. A-G Foods, Inc. v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. E.H. Ashley & Co., Inc. And Willow Associates v. Wells Fargo Alarm Services, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  5. Dalury v. S-K-I, Ltd.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jones v. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
  2. Prysmian Cables and Systems USA LLC v. ADT Commercial LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API