Omni Corp. v. Sonitrol Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING AND ORDER
CHATIGNY, District Judge.
This is a diversity action against a provider of alarm services to recover damages arising from flooding at commercial premises. Defendant has moved to dismiss the action insofar as it seeks damages in excess of $300, the amount provided for in a damages limitation clause in the parties’ contract. In addition, defendant moves to dismiss a claim brought under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUT-PA), Conn. Gen.Stat. §§ 42-110a, et seq. For the reasons' that follow, the motion is granted.
I. Facts
The complaint alleges the following facts, which…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- A-G Foods, Inc. v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- E.H. Ashley & Co., Inc. And Willow Associates v. Wells Fargo Alarm Services, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Dalury v. S-K-I, Ltd.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jones v. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
- Prysmian Cables and Systems USA LLC v. ADT Commercial LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023