Burdick v. United States Finishing Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtElls, J.
The plaintiff had been employed by the named defendant for forty years as a dyer. During the last six months of that period he had also mixed copper nitrate. This operation consists of placing cop per rolls. in a large vat of nitric acid. He claims that on two occasions, while so engaged, he got an overdose of nitric acid fumes, resulting in a compensable injury. The commissioner, having heard the case, found against the plaintiff; upon an appeal to the Superior Court the case was remanded to the commissioner for a further hearing and finding of additional facts; after this hearing the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Driscoll v. Jewell Belting Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Cishowski v. Clayton Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
3Cited by9 opinions
- National Folding Box Co. v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Stephanofsky v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- King v. New Haven Trap Rock Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Greenberg v. Electric Boat Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Stankewicz v. Stanley WorksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.