Legal Opinion

Cishowski v. Clayton Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 5, 1927PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.

The finding made by the commissioner discloses that the claimant came to this country from Poland in 1913 in good health, and entered the employ of the respondent as a grinder, and remained continuously in that employment till 1926 when the disability occurred. His work was the grinding of cast steel scissors which were held against a revolving wheel, either of wood or leather with an emery rim, or of solid carborundum. Claimant -sat near this wheel, which revolved at high speed away from the operator, and pressed the scissors against this revolving wheel. The result was that particles of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Larke v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  2. Madore v. New Departure Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  3. Dupre v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  4. Kovaliski v. Collins Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  5. Mesite v. International Silver Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Marsh v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Clark v. HaggardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  3. McCulloch v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  4. Carangelo v. Nutmeg Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API